https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197425 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, restoring the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's decision to discontinue the Section 145 proceedings. The Court criticized the High Court's ruling, emphasizing that interim orders do not prevent contrary final orders based on evidence and that parallel criminal proceedings should not continue when a civil court is handling possession disputes to prevent multiple litigations. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197425 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, restoring the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's decision to discontinue the Section 145 proceedings. The Court criticized the High Court's ruling, emphasizing that interim orders do not prevent contrary final orders based on evidence and that parallel criminal proceedings should not continue when a civil court is handling possession disputes to prevent multiple litigations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197425