https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197425 Where a civil court is already seized of a dispute over the same property, title and possession, and has passed a status quo order, parallel proceedings under Section 145 CrPC should ordinarily not continue because multiplicity of litigation ought to be avoided. Earlier interim orders refusing to drop the proceedings did not bind the Magistrate at the final stage, since they were passed on an incomplete factual record and the overlap with the civil suit had later become clear. The SC therefore restored the Magistrate's order discontinuing the Section 145 proceedings and set aside the High Court's interference. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197425 Where a civil court is already seized of a dispute over the same property, title and possession, and has passed a status quo order, parallel proceedings under Section 145 CrPC should ordinarily not continue because multiplicity of litigation ought to be avoided. Earlier interim orders refusing to drop the proceedings did not bind the Magistrate at the final stage, since they were passed on an incomplete factual record and the overlap with the civil suit had later become clear. The SC therefore restored the Magistrate's order discontinuing the Section 145 proceedings and set aside the High Court's interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197425