<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the applicant&#039;s application for reference to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act was upheld by the High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were deemed to be based on proper factual analysis, with no perversity found in its decision. The High Court concluded that the matter was factual in nature and did not warrant a reference, ultimately affirming the dismissal of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the applicant&#039;s application for reference to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act was upheld by the High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were deemed to be based on proper factual analysis, with no perversity found in its decision. The High Court concluded that the matter was factual in nature and did not warrant a reference, ultimately affirming the dismissal of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>