<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353541</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, emphasizing the factual nature of the issues raised and the absence of any substantial question of law for consideration. The judgment highlighted the importance of factual analysis, including evidence of agricultural activities, intention in land transactions, and the significance of revenue records in determining land use classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353541</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, emphasizing the factual nature of the issues raised and the absence of any substantial question of law for consideration. The judgment highlighted the importance of factual analysis, including evidence of agricultural activities, intention in land transactions, and the significance of revenue records in determining land use classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>