<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 276 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353540</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court addressed the issue of potential double payment of IGST highlighted by the petitioner. The court directed the respondents to clarify the matter and scheduled a re-listing for further consideration. If the petitioner&#039;s claim is substantiated, appropriate orders would be issued. The court emphasized the importance of resolving the ambiguity regarding IGST calculation to prevent unjust double taxation. The decision to dispose of the stay application with observations indicated the court&#039;s intention to proceed while mitigating adverse effects on the petitioner, showcasing a balanced consideration of concerns and tax implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 276 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353540</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court addressed the issue of potential double payment of IGST highlighted by the petitioner. The court directed the respondents to clarify the matter and scheduled a re-listing for further consideration. If the petitioner&#039;s claim is substantiated, appropriate orders would be issued. The court emphasized the importance of resolving the ambiguity regarding IGST calculation to prevent unjust double taxation. The decision to dispose of the stay application with observations indicated the court&#039;s intention to proceed while mitigating adverse effects on the petitioner, showcasing a balanced consideration of concerns and tax implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>