<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 268 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant was eligible for exemption from service tax on services provided to SEZ units. They set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs, if any, in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 07:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 268 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant was eligible for exemption from service tax on services provided to SEZ units. They set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs, if any, in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>