https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353530 The tribunal ruled in favor of the cricketer, holding that he was not liable to pay service tax for the consideration received for playing in the IPL. The tribunal found that the demand was vague and unenforceable as it did not specify the nature of services provided by the cricketer, and that the consideration for brand promotion fell below the exemption limit. The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the impugned order, absolving the cricketer from any service tax liability. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353530 The tribunal ruled in favor of the cricketer, holding that he was not liable to pay service tax for the consideration received for playing in the IPL. The tribunal found that the demand was vague and unenforceable as it did not specify the nature of services provided by the cricketer, and that the consideration for brand promotion fell below the exemption limit. The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the impugned order, absolving the cricketer from any service tax liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353530