https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353523 The Tribunal upheld the Department's findings of clandestine clearances against the appellant, rejecting the appellant's defense due to insufficient evidence. The imposed penalties were upheld, with a minor reduction for one partner. The Tribunal found the Department's evidence, including statements from buyers, sufficient to establish the allegations. The appellant's arguments regarding cash transactions and trading activities were deemed unconvincing. The appeals were dismissed, and the lower authorities' decision was affirmed. en-us Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353523 The Tribunal upheld the Department's findings of clandestine clearances against the appellant, rejecting the appellant's defense due to insufficient evidence. The imposed penalties were upheld, with a minor reduction for one partner. The Tribunal found the Department's evidence, including statements from buyers, sufficient to establish the allegations. The appellant's arguments regarding cash transactions and trading activities were deemed unconvincing. The appeals were dismissed, and the lower authorities' decision was affirmed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353523