<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 255 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax credit on construction activity due to limitation, maintained the demand for input credit but set aside the penalty, and remanded the issue of service tax credit on various input services for further adjudication. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of accordingly with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 07:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 255 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax credit on construction activity due to limitation, maintained the demand for input credit but set aside the penalty, and remanded the issue of service tax credit on various input services for further adjudication. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of accordingly with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>