<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 253 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the denial of cenvat credit on specific capital goods used for constructing structures to support capital goods. Relying on a Supreme Court judgment and the amended definition of &quot;input&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Tribunal held that items used for fabricating supporting structures were not eligible for cenvat credit. The judgment was pronounced on 29/11/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 07:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 253 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the denial of cenvat credit on specific capital goods used for constructing structures to support capital goods. Relying on a Supreme Court judgment and the amended definition of &quot;input&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Tribunal held that items used for fabricating supporting structures were not eligible for cenvat credit. The judgment was pronounced on 29/11/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>