https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197419 The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the tribunal's decision to allow the refund of Cenvat Credit before the respondent's registration with the Department. The court found that the respondent was a registered provider at the time of the refund application, meeting the necessary condition for the refund. As no substantial question of law was identified, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the tribunal's ruling on the Cenvat Credit refund. en-us Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197419 The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the tribunal's decision to allow the refund of Cenvat Credit before the respondent's registration with the Department. The court found that the respondent was a registered provider at the time of the refund application, meeting the necessary condition for the refund. As no substantial question of law was identified, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the tribunal's ruling on the Cenvat Credit refund. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197419