https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197423 The court declined to entertain the petitions challenging the vires of Annexure-III to the Customs Tariff Rules and the guidelines for determining non-injurious prices for the domestic industry. It held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has the authority to examine the vires of subordinate legislation under the Customs Tariff Act. The court dismissed the petitions and advised the petitioners to seek relief from CESTAT in accordance with the law, concluding the judgment on the jurisdiction and vires of the ADD Rules. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 07:15:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197423 The court declined to entertain the petitions challenging the vires of Annexure-III to the Customs Tariff Rules and the guidelines for determining non-injurious prices for the domestic industry. It held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has the authority to examine the vires of subordinate legislation under the Customs Tariff Act. The court dismissed the petitions and advised the petitioners to seek relief from CESTAT in accordance with the law, concluding the judgment on the jurisdiction and vires of the ADD Rules. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197423