<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 598 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197410</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the civil appeal. The order records only the procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle or factual determination beyond that refusal to interfere.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 598 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197410</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the civil appeal. The order records only the procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle or factual determination beyond that refusal to interfere.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>