https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197409 The court held that the availability of a civil suit does not constitute "any other remedy" under Article 226(3) of the Constitution, allowing the writ petition to proceed. It determined that the quota system and rotation of vacancies should be separately applied to Assistant Workshop Superintendents. The court dismissed challenges to the petitioner's appointment as a Foreman due to untimeliness and adjusted the seniority list in favor of the petitioner. The writ petition was successful, directing corrective actions on the seniority list and transfer orders without costs. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:56:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197409 The court held that the availability of a civil suit does not constitute "any other remedy" under Article 226(3) of the Constitution, allowing the writ petition to proceed. It determined that the quota system and rotation of vacancies should be separately applied to Assistant Workshop Superintendents. The court dismissed challenges to the petitioner's appointment as a Foreman due to untimeliness and adjusted the seniority list in favor of the petitioner. The writ petition was successful, directing corrective actions on the seniority list and transfer orders without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197409