<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>why a separate IGST on the total GST value?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113276</link>
    <description>The issue is whether a third party event partner may add a separate IGST charge on a consolidated bill that already carries GST for the same supply. GST applies to supply of goods or services, and there is no basis for imposing an additional distinct IGST where the taxable supply or its components are already subject to GST. Charging multiple overlapping GST components risks duplicate taxation and is inconsistent with applying the correct GST rate to each invoice element.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 16:46:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>why a separate IGST on the total GST value?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113276</link>
      <description>The issue is whether a third party event partner may add a separate IGST charge on a consolidated bill that already carries GST for the same supply. GST applies to supply of goods or services, and there is no basis for imposing an additional distinct IGST where the taxable supply or its components are already subject to GST. Charging multiple overlapping GST components risks duplicate taxation and is inconsistent with applying the correct GST rate to each invoice element.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 16:46:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>