<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (5) TMI 33 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197405</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the plaintiffs&#039; title and right to possession of the disputed land, dismissing the appellants&#039; claims. The plaintiffs acquired title through auction purchase, obtained possession through court, and filed the suit within the limitation period. The appellants, as trespassers, had no valid title or claim for reimbursement. The court held that the suit was not barred by acquiescence, ruling in favor of the plaintiffs and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 15:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (5) TMI 33 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197405</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the plaintiffs&#039; title and right to possession of the disputed land, dismissing the appellants&#039; claims. The plaintiffs acquired title through auction purchase, obtained possession through court, and filed the suit within the limitation period. The appellants, as trespassers, had no valid title or claim for reimbursement. The court held that the suit was not barred by acquiescence, ruling in favor of the plaintiffs and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>