<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 88 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197402</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal regarding ownership and possession of a &#039;sal&#039; adjacent to a temple. The plaintiff&#039;s claim was rejected as the court found that the &#039;sal&#039; was used by the barber community without objection from the plaintiff. The court denied the benefit of res judicata due to non-compliance with procedural rules in a previous suit. Despite the plaintiff&#039;s reliance on historical documents and previous judgments, the court determined that ownership remained unclear. No mandatory injunction was granted as exclusive ownership was not proven, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 15:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 88 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197402</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal regarding ownership and possession of a &#039;sal&#039; adjacent to a temple. The plaintiff&#039;s claim was rejected as the court found that the &#039;sal&#039; was used by the barber community without objection from the plaintiff. The court denied the benefit of res judicata due to non-compliance with procedural rules in a previous suit. Despite the plaintiff&#039;s reliance on historical documents and previous judgments, the court determined that ownership remained unclear. No mandatory injunction was granted as exclusive ownership was not proven, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>