https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197400 Long, open and uninterrupted user of a passage, supported by boundary recitals in the pattas, was treated as recognition of a customary right of way rather than permissive use, so the obstruction amounted to substantial interference with passage and drainage rights and justified removal of encroachment and injunctive relief. The suits were also held maintainable without the Advocate General's consent because they asserted independent rights of neighbouring residents, including passage and related easementary interests, and were not confined to a mere public nuisance. Special damage was alternatively shown. The appellate dismissal was reversed and the trial court's decrees were restored. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 15:24:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197400 Long, open and uninterrupted user of a passage, supported by boundary recitals in the pattas, was treated as recognition of a customary right of way rather than permissive use, so the obstruction amounted to substantial interference with passage and drainage rights and justified removal of encroachment and injunctive relief. The suits were also held maintainable without the Advocate General's consent because they asserted independent rights of neighbouring residents, including passage and related easementary interests, and were not confined to a mere public nuisance. Special damage was alternatively shown. The appellate dismissal was reversed and the trial court's decrees were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197400