https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197400 The court held in favor of the plaintiffs, establishing their right of way as a matter of right, granting easementary rights for drainage, and rejecting the defendants' arguments regarding patta validity and necessity of Advocate General's consent. The court dismissed claims of delay and laches, issuing a mandatory injunction for the removal of the encroachment. The defendants were given one month to comply, with costs awarded to the plaintiffs. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the Senior Civil Judge's judgment and restoring the trial court's decrees. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 15:24:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197400 The court held in favor of the plaintiffs, establishing their right of way as a matter of right, granting easementary rights for drainage, and rejecting the defendants' arguments regarding patta validity and necessity of Advocate General's consent. The court dismissed claims of delay and laches, issuing a mandatory injunction for the removal of the encroachment. The defendants were given one month to comply, with costs awarded to the plaintiffs. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the Senior Civil Judge's judgment and restoring the trial court's decrees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197400