https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197399 The plaintiffs' appeal was allowed, setting aside the first appellate court's decree and restoring the trial court's decision. The defendant's appeal was dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs. The judgment reaffirmed the necessity of a mandatory injunction in cases of joint property disputes where partition is not feasible, emphasizing the restoration of the original state of the property as the appropriate remedy. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 15:17:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197399 The plaintiffs' appeal was allowed, setting aside the first appellate court's decree and restoring the trial court's decision. The defendant's appeal was dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs. The judgment reaffirmed the necessity of a mandatory injunction in cases of joint property disputes where partition is not feasible, emphasizing the restoration of the original state of the property as the appropriate remedy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197399