https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197397 Breach of a prohibition against building over a wall or projecting eaves did not, on the terms of the licence, entitle the grantor to evict the licensee or recover possession, because the right of recovery was tied only to breach of the repair obligation. Denial of the grantor's title did not by itself forfeit the licence; revocation remained confined to the statutory cases, and estoppel against denial of title did not create an automatic forfeiture rule. Mandatory injunction was refused because both parties had long acquiesced in the structures, and only nominal damages were awarded for breach of warranty. en-us Thu, 06 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 15:00:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197397 Breach of a prohibition against building over a wall or projecting eaves did not, on the terms of the licence, entitle the grantor to evict the licensee or recover possession, because the right of recovery was tied only to breach of the repair obligation. Denial of the grantor's title did not by itself forfeit the licence; revocation remained confined to the statutory cases, and estoppel against denial of title did not create an automatic forfeiture rule. Mandatory injunction was refused because both parties had long acquiesced in the structures, and only nominal damages were awarded for breach of warranty. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197397