<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1002 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197393</link>
    <description>The court allowed the plaintiffs&#039; applications for amendments and granted interim relief, requiring the plaintiffs to deposit a specified amount and file an undertaking. The court found discrepancies in the transaction indicating it might not be a simple sale, necessitating a trial to determine the true nature of the transaction. Interim relief was granted, restraining the defendants from dealing with the shares during the suit&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1002 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197393</link>
      <description>The court allowed the plaintiffs&#039; applications for amendments and granted interim relief, requiring the plaintiffs to deposit a specified amount and file an undertaking. The court found discrepancies in the transaction indicating it might not be a simple sale, necessitating a trial to determine the true nature of the transaction. Interim relief was granted, restraining the defendants from dealing with the shares during the suit&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>