<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1517 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197389</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court&#039;s order dated 7 January 2011 records dismissal of the customs appeal in Electronic Instrumentation versus Commissioner. No further reasoning, statutory interpretation, or factual findings appear in the supplied extract, so the only operative effect stated is dismissal of the appeal. The document therefore functions as a bare disposal entry rather than a reasoned precedent, and it offers no additional guidance on the customs issue beyond the outcome recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1517 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197389</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court&#039;s order dated 7 January 2011 records dismissal of the customs appeal in Electronic Instrumentation versus Commissioner. No further reasoning, statutory interpretation, or factual findings appear in the supplied extract, so the only operative effect stated is dismissal of the appeal. The document therefore functions as a bare disposal entry rather than a reasoned precedent, and it offers no additional guidance on the customs issue beyond the outcome recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>