<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 725 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197387</link>
    <description>Review petitions in a customs matter were examined with the connected papers, and the Supreme Court found no merit in the requests for reconsideration. The review petitions were dismissed, leaving the prior appellate disposition undisturbed. The order records only the rejection of review and does not set out any fresh legal principle on customs liability or procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 725 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197387</link>
      <description>Review petitions in a customs matter were examined with the connected papers, and the Supreme Court found no merit in the requests for reconsideration. The review petitions were dismissed, leaving the prior appellate disposition undisturbed. The order records only the rejection of review and does not set out any fresh legal principle on customs liability or procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>