<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1534 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197386</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the limited grievance regarding copies of the agreement between respondents was addressed by directing respondent No. 3 to provide the agreement copy within two weeks. The court ruled that the company court lacked jurisdiction for the substantive reliefs sought, leading to the dismissal of the application with liberty to pursue suitable legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:56:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1534 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197386</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the limited grievance regarding copies of the agreement between respondents was addressed by directing respondent No. 3 to provide the agreement copy within two weeks. The court ruled that the company court lacked jurisdiction for the substantive reliefs sought, leading to the dismissal of the application with liberty to pursue suitable legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>