https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197383 The court dismissed both writ petitions due to the absence of Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami as a party, deeming them non-maintainable. It upheld the constitutionality of the notice of motion and actions under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, finding no procedural illegalities by the Inquiry Committee. The court declined to reconsider the earlier decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability and restricted the role of third parties in the Inquiry Committee proceedings. Justice K. Ramaswamy emphasized the exclusion of adverse evidence by third parties and stressed judicial independence and integrity. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197383 The court dismissed both writ petitions due to the absence of Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami as a party, deeming them non-maintainable. It upheld the constitutionality of the notice of motion and actions under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, finding no procedural illegalities by the Inquiry Committee. The court declined to reconsider the earlier decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability and restricted the role of third parties in the Inquiry Committee proceedings. Justice K. Ramaswamy emphasized the exclusion of adverse evidence by third parties and stressed judicial independence and integrity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197383