https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197381 The Court held that the prohibition on practicing before the same High Court applies only to Permanent Judges, not Additional Judges. It emphasized the need to respect the constitutional choice and stated that any amendment to the provision should be made by Parliament, not through judicial interpretation. The Petition was dismissed, with no order as to costs. en-us Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 10:21:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197381 The Court held that the prohibition on practicing before the same High Court applies only to Permanent Judges, not Additional Judges. It emphasized the need to respect the constitutional choice and stated that any amendment to the provision should be made by Parliament, not through judicial interpretation. The Petition was dismissed, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197381