https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197379 The Supreme Court held that judicial officers were not deemed confirmed after completing the maximum probation period without confirmation. The Court clarified that Rule 24 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules does not provide for automatic confirmation and requires a positive act of confirmation by the appointing authority. The termination orders of probationary officers were deemed valid as they were found unsuitable for confirmation by the Full Court. The Court emphasized that continuation beyond the probation period does not automatically lead to confirmation unless explicitly stated in the rules. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment. en-us Tue, 14 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 09:57:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197379 The Supreme Court held that judicial officers were not deemed confirmed after completing the maximum probation period without confirmation. The Court clarified that Rule 24 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules does not provide for automatic confirmation and requires a positive act of confirmation by the appointing authority. The termination orders of probationary officers were deemed valid as they were found unsuitable for confirmation by the Full Court. The Court emphasized that continuation beyond the probation period does not automatically lead to confirmation unless explicitly stated in the rules. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197379