<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 229 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353493</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal found the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by a Foreign Company against the Corporate Debtor, to be not maintainable due to the absence of a &#039;record of default&#039; and lack of proper authorization. The Tribunal declared the orders of the Adjudicating Authority, including the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and declaration of moratorium, as unsustainable. Consequently, all actions and orders were set aside, allowing the Corporate Debtor to resume independent operations. The appeal was allowed, and the proceedings were directed to be closed, with the Appellant bearing the fees of the Interim Resolution Professional, if appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 09:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 229 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353493</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal found the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by a Foreign Company against the Corporate Debtor, to be not maintainable due to the absence of a &#039;record of default&#039; and lack of proper authorization. The Tribunal declared the orders of the Adjudicating Authority, including the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and declaration of moratorium, as unsustainable. Consequently, all actions and orders were set aside, allowing the Corporate Debtor to resume independent operations. The appeal was allowed, and the proceedings were directed to be closed, with the Appellant bearing the fees of the Interim Resolution Professional, if appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>