https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353492 The High Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging anti-dumping notifications, directing the petitioner to exhaust the statutory remedy by appealing before the Appellate Tribunal. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction and clarified that its observations were limited to the decision on the writ petition, not the merits of the imposition of anti-circumvention duty on Cold Rolled Stainless Steel above 1250 mm. The court did not entertain the application for amending the writ petition and made no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353492 The High Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging anti-dumping notifications, directing the petitioner to exhaust the statutory remedy by appealing before the Appellate Tribunal. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction and clarified that its observations were limited to the decision on the writ petition, not the merits of the imposition of anti-circumvention duty on Cold Rolled Stainless Steel above 1250 mm. The court did not entertain the application for amending the writ petition and made no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353492