https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353483 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the order confirming Service Tax demand, interest, and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994, as the petitioner did not utilize the alternative remedy before CESTAT. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing factual issues before the Tribunal and utilizing available appeal remedies under the Act. The petitioner was granted the option to file an appeal before CESTAT, with no costs awarded. The judgment underscored the need to follow proper legal procedures and address factual matters through appropriate channels rather than directly seeking redress from the Court. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353483 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the order confirming Service Tax demand, interest, and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994, as the petitioner did not utilize the alternative remedy before CESTAT. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing factual issues before the Tribunal and utilizing available appeal remedies under the Act. The petitioner was granted the option to file an appeal before CESTAT, with no costs awarded. The judgment underscored the need to follow proper legal procedures and address factual matters through appropriate channels rather than directly seeking redress from the Court. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353483