<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 216 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353480</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed except for setting aside the demand under Rule 6 (3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the associated penalties. The Tribunal upheld the classification and service tax demand as confirmed by the Original Authority, except for the disputed amount under Rule 6 (3). The penalties related to this non-sustainable demand were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 216 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353480</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed except for setting aside the demand under Rule 6 (3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the associated penalties. The Tribunal upheld the classification and service tax demand as confirmed by the Original Authority, except for the disputed amount under Rule 6 (3). The penalties related to this non-sustainable demand were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>