https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353478 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the logo in question is classified as a copyright, not a trademark. Consequently, the levy of service tax on the royalty income was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal also found the extended period of limitation improperly invoked, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353478 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the logo in question is classified as a copyright, not a trademark. Consequently, the levy of service tax on the royalty income was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal also found the extended period of limitation improperly invoked, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353478