<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Classification of Food Preparations Resolved; Unanimous Decision on Limitation Period Nullifies Demand.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37379</link>
    <description>Classification of food preparations, namely, wheat flour, rice flour, corn crunch, rice crunch, etc. - Whether the goods in question are classifiable under chapter heading 1901.11 or under chapter heading 1901.19 or not? - Difference of opinion on merit i.e. issue of classification but concurrent decision on the issue of period of limitation while setting aside the demand. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:15:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Classification of Food Preparations Resolved; Unanimous Decision on Limitation Period Nullifies Demand.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37379</link>
      <description>Classification of food preparations, namely, wheat flour, rice flour, corn crunch, rice crunch, etc. - Whether the goods in question are classifiable under chapter heading 1901.11 or under chapter heading 1901.19 or not? - Difference of opinion on merit i.e. issue of classification but concurrent decision on the issue of period of limitation while setting aside the demand. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:15:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>