<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 208 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353472</link>
    <description>The High Court emphasized the importance of the appellant&#039;s right to cross-examine the foreman due to discrepancies in statements, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for this purpose. The Court instructed the Tribunal to decide the case based on the law and available evidence, disposing of the appeal with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 208 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353472</link>
      <description>The High Court emphasized the importance of the appellant&#039;s right to cross-examine the foreman due to discrepancies in statements, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for this purpose. The Court instructed the Tribunal to decide the case based on the law and available evidence, disposing of the appeal with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>