https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353469 The Tribunal upheld demands related to clandestine removal of goods based on diary entries and admissions by buyers, reducing penalties for timely payment. However, demands concerning shortage/excess of goods lacked concrete evidence and were set aside, along with associated penalties. For one company, demands on clandestine removal and shortage/excess of finished goods were confirmed, with penalties reduced to 25%. In another case, duty on clandestine removal was confirmed, with penalties similarly reduced. The Tribunal disposed of all appeals accordingly, confirming valid demands supported by evidence and setting aside those lacking concrete proof. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353469 The Tribunal upheld demands related to clandestine removal of goods based on diary entries and admissions by buyers, reducing penalties for timely payment. However, demands concerning shortage/excess of goods lacked concrete evidence and were set aside, along with associated penalties. For one company, demands on clandestine removal and shortage/excess of finished goods were confirmed, with penalties reduced to 25%. In another case, duty on clandestine removal was confirmed, with penalties similarly reduced. The Tribunal disposed of all appeals accordingly, confirming valid demands supported by evidence and setting aside those lacking concrete proof. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353469