<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2700 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to an inordinate and unexplained delay of 1625 days in filing the appeal. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to the statutory period of limitation, the Tribunal found the reasons provided by the assessee insufficient to condone the delay. Consequently, the substantive issue regarding the deduction under Section 80HHC on DEPB benefits was not adjudicated, and the appeal was dismissed as not admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2700 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to an inordinate and unexplained delay of 1625 days in filing the appeal. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to the statutory period of limitation, the Tribunal found the reasons provided by the assessee insufficient to condone the delay. Consequently, the substantive issue regarding the deduction under Section 80HHC on DEPB benefits was not adjudicated, and the appeal was dismissed as not admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>