<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1515 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197378</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confirmation of Rs. 7.5 lakhs as unexplained money and Rs. 15 lakhs as unaccounted sales due to the absence and negligence of the assessee. The appeal was dismissed because of a 1382-day delay in filing, which the tribunal found was not adequately explained by the assessee. The tribunal emphasized the need for valid reasons to condone such delays and concluded that the delay was within the assessee&#039;s control, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1515 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197378</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confirmation of Rs. 7.5 lakhs as unexplained money and Rs. 15 lakhs as unaccounted sales due to the absence and negligence of the assessee. The appeal was dismissed because of a 1382-day delay in filing, which the tribunal found was not adequately explained by the assessee. The tribunal emphasized the need for valid reasons to condone such delays and concluded that the delay was within the assessee&#039;s control, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>