https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197366 A probationer is not deemed confirmed merely because the prescribed or extended probation period has elapsed where the governing rules require a specific order of satisfactory completion. The probation rules here expressly excluded any presumption of automatic confirmation and allowed discharge for unsuitability without a formal disciplinary inquiry. Read with the judicial service recruitment rules, the absence of an express confirmation order and the negative wording of the probation provisions defeated any claim to deemed confirmation. The discharge order was a simple non-stigmatic termination of a probationer's service and was therefore valid. en-us Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jan 2018 18:51:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197366 A probationer is not deemed confirmed merely because the prescribed or extended probation period has elapsed where the governing rules require a specific order of satisfactory completion. The probation rules here expressly excluded any presumption of automatic confirmation and allowed discharge for unsuitability without a formal disciplinary inquiry. Read with the judicial service recruitment rules, the absence of an express confirmation order and the negative wording of the probation provisions defeated any claim to deemed confirmation. The discharge order was a simple non-stigmatic termination of a probationer's service and was therefore valid. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197366