https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197365 A judicial appointee on probation was terminated for unsatisfactory performance and suitability, with the decision characterised as termination simpliciter rather than disciplinary removal. The decision rested on assessment during probation of overall performance, conduct and fitness for continuation; no separate inquiry was treated as necessary for a non-stigmatic termination. The challenge alleging violation of natural justice and stigma was rejected on the basis that the action addressed suitability for service and did not amount to punitive removal. The appeal against termination was unsuccessful and parties were left to bear their own costs. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jan 2026 13:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197365 A judicial appointee on probation was terminated for unsatisfactory performance and suitability, with the decision characterised as termination simpliciter rather than disciplinary removal. The decision rested on assessment during probation of overall performance, conduct and fitness for continuation; no separate inquiry was treated as necessary for a non-stigmatic termination. The challenge alleging violation of natural justice and stigma was rejected on the basis that the action addressed suitability for service and did not amount to punitive removal. The appeal against termination was unsuccessful and parties were left to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197365