<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 285 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197363</link>
    <description>A government servant can claim reversion under lien rules only if he held the earlier post substantively on a permanent basis; a temporary appointment and lack of reliable proof of deputation meant no lien on the Lekhpal post was established. Termination of a temporary Assistant Consolidation Officer as no longer required, based on unsuitability and without a charge of misconduct or stigma, was treated as a valid termination simpliciter and did not attract Article 311 or require a departmental inquiry. The challenge therefore failed on merits, though ex gratia relief was granted on equitable considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 285 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197363</link>
      <description>A government servant can claim reversion under lien rules only if he held the earlier post substantively on a permanent basis; a temporary appointment and lack of reliable proof of deputation meant no lien on the Lekhpal post was established. Termination of a temporary Assistant Consolidation Officer as no longer required, based on unsuitability and without a charge of misconduct or stigma, was treated as a valid termination simpliciter and did not attract Article 311 or require a departmental inquiry. The challenge therefore failed on merits, though ex gratia relief was granted on equitable considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>