<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 13 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11286</link>
    <description>For valuing the perquisite of rent-free accommodation, the relevant benchmark is the standard rent fixed under the applicable rent control law for similar accommodation. The Tribunal&#039;s determination of the perquisite value of rent-free accommodation, furniture, electricity and water was upheld on that basis, as the market value had to be measured by reference to standard rent. The question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 13 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11286</link>
      <description>For valuing the perquisite of rent-free accommodation, the relevant benchmark is the standard rent fixed under the applicable rent control law for similar accommodation. The Tribunal&#039;s determination of the perquisite value of rent-free accommodation, furniture, electricity and water was upheld on that basis, as the market value had to be measured by reference to standard rent. The question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>