<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11284</link>
    <description>In a sale-cum-leaseback claim for depreciation, the assessee must prove a real transfer of possession and compliance with the statutory requirements; where the documents do not show genuine delivery, redelivery, identification of the machinery, or commercial substance, the arrangement may be treated as a sham or colourable device and depreciation disallowed. If the transaction is found unreal and tax-avoidance oriented, the Revenue may look beyond form to its true character, treat it as a financing arrangement, and bring notional interest to tax on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 01:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11284</link>
      <description>In a sale-cum-leaseback claim for depreciation, the assessee must prove a real transfer of possession and compliance with the statutory requirements; where the documents do not show genuine delivery, redelivery, identification of the machinery, or commercial substance, the arrangement may be treated as a sham or colourable device and depreciation disallowed. If the transaction is found unreal and tax-avoidance oriented, the Revenue may look beyond form to its true character, treat it as a financing arrangement, and bring notional interest to tax on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>