<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11276</link>
    <description>An appellate authority may have implied and incidental power to grant interim relief even where the statute does not expressly provide for it, because such power can be necessary to make the appellate remedy effective. Refusing to consider interim relief solely for want of an express enabling provision was therefore unsustainable. The matter was remitted to the appellate authority for expeditious consideration of the interim relief application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11276</link>
      <description>An appellate authority may have implied and incidental power to grant interim relief even where the statute does not expressly provide for it, because such power can be necessary to make the appellate remedy effective. Refusing to consider interim relief solely for want of an express enabling provision was therefore unsustainable. The matter was remitted to the appellate authority for expeditious consideration of the interim relief application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>