<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 180 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax erred in invoking revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer had already conducted thorough enquiries during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order, stating it was not in accordance with the law, and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 09:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 180 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax erred in invoking revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer had already conducted thorough enquiries during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order, stating it was not in accordance with the law, and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>