<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 175 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and granting consequential relief as per law, following the ratio laid down in the Kubota Agricultural Machinery decision. The appellants had discharged the appropriate sales tax/VAT for the sale of imported goods, and therefore, the refund claims under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. could not be denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 175 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and granting consequential relief as per law, following the ratio laid down in the Kubota Agricultural Machinery decision. The appellants had discharged the appropriate sales tax/VAT for the sale of imported goods, and therefore, the refund claims under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. could not be denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>