<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 173 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification No.21/2002, as amended by subsequent notifications, regarding the classification of imported coal as coking coal. It affirmed the retrospective application of Notifications No.21/2011 and 77/2011, emphasizing compliance with specified requirements outlined in Notification No.77/2011 for exemption. The decision underscored the significance of accurately interpreting statutory notifications and ensuring adherence to specified conditions for claiming exemptions under customs regulations, ultimately supporting the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption based on the specified coal criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 173 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification No.21/2002, as amended by subsequent notifications, regarding the classification of imported coal as coking coal. It affirmed the retrospective application of Notifications No.21/2011 and 77/2011, emphasizing compliance with specified requirements outlined in Notification No.77/2011 for exemption. The decision underscored the significance of accurately interpreting statutory notifications and ensuring adherence to specified conditions for claiming exemptions under customs regulations, ultimately supporting the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption based on the specified coal criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>