<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 166 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the limitation period for filing refund claims of unutilized CENVAT credit, the validity of CENVAT credit on various services, and the remanding of the matter on service classification. The Tribunal held that refund claims filed within one year from the date of Foreign Inward Remission Certificate (FIRCs) should be considered within the limitation period. It affirmed the appellant&#039;s right to claim CENVAT credit on input services related to exported services and concluded that regardless of service classification, the appellant was entitled to the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 08:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 166 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the limitation period for filing refund claims of unutilized CENVAT credit, the validity of CENVAT credit on various services, and the remanding of the matter on service classification. The Tribunal held that refund claims filed within one year from the date of Foreign Inward Remission Certificate (FIRCs) should be considered within the limitation period. It affirmed the appellant&#039;s right to claim CENVAT credit on input services related to exported services and concluded that regardless of service classification, the appellant was entitled to the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>