https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353415 The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with both issues requiring detailed verification and examination to determine the correct application of Cenvat Credit Rules and credit entitlement for the appellant. The matter was remanded for verification of the reversed amount in the first issue regarding maintenance of separate cenvatable accounts for taxable and exempted services, and for further examination to clarify the usage of copper strips cleared to the SEZ area in the second issue. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jan 2018 08:54:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353415 The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with both issues requiring detailed verification and examination to determine the correct application of Cenvat Credit Rules and credit entitlement for the appellant. The matter was remanded for verification of the reversed amount in the first issue regarding maintenance of separate cenvatable accounts for taxable and exempted services, and for further examination to clarify the usage of copper strips cleared to the SEZ area in the second issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353415