<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1278 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by remitting the issue of disallowance under Section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance for delayed payment of PF and ESI, citing compliance with Section 43B. The appeal outcome was pronounced on April 13, 2017, at Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 19:12:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1278 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by remitting the issue of disallowance under Section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance for delayed payment of PF and ESI, citing compliance with Section 43B. The appeal outcome was pronounced on April 13, 2017, at Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>