https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197340 In a continuing public interest proceeding, the Supreme Court said its role was limited to ensuring proper investigation and placement of the material before the competent criminal court; it could not convert the matter into an adversarial prosecution or review the Governor's refusal to grant sanction for prosecution once the investigation was complete. The Court further held that it could not assume the Magistrate's function or decide criminal merits after a final report had been filed, because investigation and judicial determination occupy distinct spheres. The application was therefore rejected, and the sanction dispute and prosecution issues were left to the competent criminal court in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197340 In a continuing public interest proceeding, the Supreme Court said its role was limited to ensuring proper investigation and placement of the material before the competent criminal court; it could not convert the matter into an adversarial prosecution or review the Governor's refusal to grant sanction for prosecution once the investigation was complete. The Court further held that it could not assume the Magistrate's function or decide criminal merits after a final report had been filed, because investigation and judicial determination occupy distinct spheres. The application was therefore rejected, and the sanction dispute and prosecution issues were left to the competent criminal court in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197340