<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1343 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197338</link>
    <description>The petition was dismissed as not maintainable under Section 409 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that there was no change or likely change in the ownership of shares in the company, which is a prerequisite for invoking Section 409. Therefore, the petitioner&#039;s claims were not substantiated, and all interim orders were vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:49:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1343 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197338</link>
      <description>The petition was dismissed as not maintainable under Section 409 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that there was no change or likely change in the ownership of shares in the company, which is a prerequisite for invoking Section 409. Therefore, the petitioner&#039;s claims were not substantiated, and all interim orders were vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>